Additional Information

Available Through

Scielo

Language

Spanish

Notes

El presente artículo se enfoca en la situación de las mujeres al interior de la academia arqueológica peruana desde una perspectiva feminista que se caracteriza por su impulso disruptivo y crítico. En el Perú, la comunidad arqueológica se distingue por su amplitud y diversidad (a nivel de género, etnia, origen y posición socioeconómica). No obstante, son mínimas las investigaciones que han abordado la historia de las mujeres desde una visión integral. En este sentido, las autoras se plantearon la siguiente pregunta: ¿Cuál es la situación de las arqueólogas en los espacios de divulgación académica peruana? Ello, con el objetivo de estudiar el nivel de participación que tienen las arqueólogas en la producción académica local. Para tal finalidad, se han analizado dos de las revistas de mayor impacto a nivel nacional: Arqueología y Sociedad y el Boletín de Arqueología PUCP. Dicho análisis ha permitido visibilizar la inexistencia de equidad de género en estos dos espacios de divulgación científica ya que las mujeres se encuentran subrepresentadas con relación a sus pares masculinos, todo ello en contraposición al progresivo incremento de mujeres en este campo académico.

This article focuses on the situation of women within the Peruvian archaeological academy from a feminist perspective characterized by its disruptive and critical impulse. In Peru, the archaeological community is distinguished by its breadth and diversity (at the level of gender, ethnicity, origin and socioeconomic position). However, the investigations that have approached the history of women from an integral perspective are minimal. In this sense, the authors posed the following question: What is the situation of archaeologists in Peruvian academic dissemination spaces? This, with the aim of studying the level of participation that archaeologists have in local academic production. For this purpose, two of the magazines with the greatest impact at the national level have been analyzed: Arqueología y Sociedad and the Boletín de Arqueología PUCP. This analysis has made it possible to make visible the non-existence of gender equality in these two spaces of scientific dissemination since women are underrepresented in relation to their male peers, all in contrast to the progressive increase of women in this academic field.

Taxonomies

RPA Codes & Standards

• Archaeologist's Responsibility to Colleagues, Employees, and Students
• Archaeologist's Responsibility to the Public

CIfA Codes

• Principle 5: Recognition of aspirations of employees, colleagues and helpers in all matters of employment

Keywords & Terms

• Accountability
• General Archaeological Ethics
• Intellectual Property
• Ownership
• Professional Qualification
• Professional Relationships and Communication
• Professional Standards
• Promotion of Archaeological Research/Archaeology as Scientific Discipline

Topics & Issues

• Applied Archaeology
• Archaeological Advocacy and Activism
• Archaeological Ethics - Other
• Colonialism and Imperialism
• Equity, Representation, and Diversity
• Ethical Case Studies
• Feminism and Intersectionality
• Gender and Sexuality
• Gender Equality
• Globalization and global perspectives
• Intellectual Property Rights
• Interdisciplinary Research
• Job Security, Unemployment, and Compensation
• Privilege and Issues of Inclusivity
• Professionalism and Professional Standards