Ethics, Not Objects

Bibliographic Information

Article Title

Ethics, Not Objects

Journal Title

Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Author(s)

Van Dyke, Ruth

Year of Publication

2021

Article Pages

1-7

Web Address (URL)

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-archaeological-journal/article/abs/ethics-not-objects/4BE1959E0E84F71D9BA9F6740EFBA92C

Additional Information

Available Through

Cambridge University Press

Language

English

Notes

Posthumanist or new materialist tools, positions and conversations contain some useful ideas for archaeologists to think with, but others that I find deeply problematic. In this opinion piece, I organize my thoughts around three posthumanist ‘turns’ to objects and materials, relations and assemblages, and non-human animacy. I appreciate how some strands of Posthumanism can help us think more creatively and thoughtfully about relations between humans and non-humans, but I argue against non-anthropocentrism, flat ontology and symmetrical archaeology. Animacy and perspectivism can help remedy colonialist and late-stage capitalist destructive forces, but archaeologists should take care not simply to appropriate, patronize, or re-colonize non-western thinkers. Ultimately, I argue, we should not need continental philosophy to remind us to care about one other, all living creatures and the well-being of our shared planet. What is needed today are ethics, not convoluted turns toward objects.

Taxonomies

RPA Codes & Standards

CIfA Codes

Keywords & Terms

Topics & Issues