Additional Information

Available Through

Taylor & Francis Online

Language

English

Notes

Abstract: This paper first reviews the ways in which archaeologists identify conflict in the distant past using the examples of excavations at Hambledon Hill and Maiden Castle in the UK, and notes how it is an impersonal, generic understanding of what happened: interpretation immediately requires significant inference. Such inference places a significant responsibility on the interpreter. A similar responsibility lies with archaeologists working on the use, and misuse, of the past in more recent conflicts — and the paper briefly touches on these responsibilities in relation to the Second World War, former Yugoslavia, Ayodhya and Great Zimbabwe. These general responsibilities relating to the interpretation of conflict, which often require the identification of false interpretation, are then focused by reference to the author's work in the identification and attempted protection of the cultural heritage in Iraq following the 2003 invasion. The author proposes that it is an equal part of the responsibility of archaeologists and other cultural heritage experts to protect the cultural heritage in the event of conflict just as it is to protect the heritage from development in peacetime. Protection is only sensible, however, if that which is protected is used. The paper concludes with a discussion of the formal and informal educational value of archaeology, through formal school curricula and tourism, suggesting that qualified, responsible interpretation of the archaeological record and the acknowledgement of the limitations of archaeological inference when dealing with the evidence of past conflict may be a small contribution to the creation of an environment of peace.

Additional tags: archaeology of conflict; responsible interpretation of the past; cultural heritage

Taxonomies

RPA Codes & Standards

• Appropriate Dissemination of Research
• Archaeologist's Responsibility to the Public

CIfA Codes

• Principle 2: Responsibility for the conservation of the historic environment
• Principle 4: Responsibility for the availability of archaeological results within reasonable dispatch

Keywords & Terms

• Accountability
• Adequate and Responsible Reporting, Publication, and Dissemination
• Armed Conflict and Violence
• Conservation
• Integrity of Research Methodology and Field Procedures
• Management of Cultural Resources, Heritage, History
• Preservation of Archaeological Resources
• Protection and Non-Disclosure of Archaeological Sites
• Public Interest, Collaboration, Education, and Outreach
• Respect for and Responsibility to Affected Groups
• Stewardship

Topics & Issues

• Ethical Responsibilities of Archaeologists
• Heritage Management
• Interpreting the Past
• War, Violence, and Conflict